Part 1: Case Study Analysis and Conclusion- case study in attachment 

In 250-500 words, summarize your overall analyses and findings from the case study. Review the observations of the child you noted in the template, including how the child performed on the two mini-unit assessments. Compare your observations to determine if any developmental growth has taken place. Include additional suggestions you would share with the child’s teachers about ways to provide future support. Suggest two resources that could be shared with the family to support the natural development of their child.

 

Practicum F – Case Study Analysis and Presentation – Rubric

Collapse All Practicum F – Case Study Analysis And Presentation – RubricCollapse All

Part 1: Case Study Analysis and Conclusion – Summary

8 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Case Study Analysis and Conclusion – Summary

5. Target

8 points

Proficient summary comprehensively analyzes findings from case study by substantially comparing observations to accurately determine if any developmental growth has taken place.

4. Acceptable

6.96 points

Clear summary relevantly analyzes findings from case study by competently comparing observations to determine if any developmental growth has taken place.

3. Approaching

5.92 points

Summary vaguely analyzes findings from case study by superficially comparing observations to determine if any developmental growth has taken place.

2. Insufficient

5.52 points

Summary poorly analyzes findings from case study by unintelligibly comparing observations to determine if any developmental growth has taken place.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 1: Case Study Analysis and Conclusion – Future Support

3 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Case Study Analysis and Conclusion – Future Support

5. Target

3 points

Additional mindful, innovative suggestions to share with teachers and the family to provide future, natural development support are provided.

4. Acceptable

2.61 points

Additional competent, credible suggestions to share with teachers and the family to provide future, natural development support are provided.

3. Approaching

2.22 points

Additional weak suggestions to share with teachers and the family to provide future, natural development support are provided.

2. Insufficient

2.07 points

Additional inaccurate suggestions to share with teachers and the family to provide future, natural development support are provided.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Mentor Feedback – Evaluation Form and Feedback Description

4 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Mentor Feedback – Evaluation Form and Feedback Description

5. Target

4 points

Evaluation form is complete. Quality description of feedback is thorough and skillful rationalization of adjustments made to case study are provided.

4. Acceptable

3.48 points

Evaluation form is complete. Solid description of feedback is suitable and effective rationalization of adjustments made to case study are provided.

3. Approaching

2.96 points

Evaluation form is complete. Description of feedback is unfocused and artificial rationalization of adjustments made to case study are provided.

2. Insufficient

2.76 points

Evaluation form is incomplete. Description of feedback is erroneous and unfitting rationalization of adjustments made to case study are provided.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Mechanics of Writing

2 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Target

2 points

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.

4. Acceptable

1.74 points

Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language.

3. Approaching

1.48 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

2. Insufficient

1.38 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Paper Format

1 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Target

1 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Acceptable

0.87 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Approaching

0.74 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

2. Insufficient

0.69 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.

Documentation of Sources

2 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Target

2 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Acceptable

1.74 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Approaching

1.48 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present.

2. Insufficient

1.38 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors

1. No Submission

0 points

Not addressed.