Advanced Federal Contracts

Part 2: Determining Flowdowns

You are now a Subcontract Administrator for the Contractor that was awarded the USAF Enterprise Network contract as a result of the solicitation in Part 1 above (disregard any “revolving door” or Procurement Integrity Act implications).

Your company is a large business and has the qualifications to do almost all of the work, but must subcontract out for a small subset of specialized support.  Therefore, you are tasked to prepare a draft Subcontract Agreement that must include any necessary flowdowns from the USAF prime contract.  Your company has decided that a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) subcontract is appropriate for this subcontract, regardless of the prime contract type.  The relevant parts of the prime contract are attached.

  • Use this form to complete the flow downs:  Form to Complete Flowdowns
  • Using the “track changes” feature of Word/Wordperfect (preferred) or handwritten redlines (scanned for submission) identify which, if any, provisions you would not flow down (e.g., delete) and,
  • If applicable, identify and discuss how some of those provisions that you would flow down need to be modified.
  • Use the “Comments” function [Review>>Comments] to provide rationale for why or why not. You may also write a separate summary of your changes.

 

Rubric Name: Written Assignment (36%)

Criteria

Comments reflect a highly accomplished level of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and reasoning of the case material and case study facts resulting in accurate, thorough, and soundly reasoned conclusions.

(11.34 – 12.6)

Comments reflect an excellent level of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and reasoning of the case material and case study facts resulting in accurately reasoned conclusions.

(10.08 – 11.33)

Comments reflect a satisfactory level of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and reasoning of the case material and case study facts resulting in partially correct conclusions that lack development or detail that demonstrates insight into reasoning.

(8.82 – 10.07)

Comments reflect an unsatisfactory level of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and reasoning of the case material and case study facts, resulting in conclusions that are underdeveloped or lack soundly reasoned conclusions.

(7.56 – 8.81)

Comments reflect an unsatisfactory level of analysis, synthesis, evaluation and reasoning of the case material and case study facts, resulting in failure to draw little to no conclusions.

(0 – 7.55)

Presents exceptionally well-supported arguments or positions with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts.

Presents excellent arguments or positions that are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate understanding of the material and concepts.

Satisfactory arguments or positions are presented but there is a mix of opinion or unclear view with supported arguments using course readings.  Case study facts are occasionally used but arguments would be much stronger with use of facts.

Arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; Limited use of facts in case study and essential information presented in course readings.

Arguments lack meaningful explanation or support of ideas.  Does not provide facts presented in case study.

Demonstrates exceptional understanding of requirements responding completely to each aspect of assignment including minor aspects of the assignment such as using third person writing, required use of course readings, and assignment format.

(4.86 -5.4)

Demonstrates excellent understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment.

(

Case Study About Quantitative Analysis

  • ·         A description of the impact of import quotas on prices, quantities supplied, and quantities demanded—Problem 7-1.
  • ·          A description of the impact of import quotas on consumers—Problem 7-1.
  • ·          A description of the effect of a complete trade ban on a country—Problem 7-8.
  • ·          A visual graph depicting scenarios 1 and 3; base your answer on the 7.2.1 and 7.2.2 charts. Create the charts using actual numbers.
  • ·         A description of the impact of import quotas on prices, quantities supplied, and quantities demanded—Problem 7-1.
  • ·          A description of the impact of import quotas on consumers—Problem 7-1.
  • ·          A description of the effect of a complete trade ban on a country—Problem 7-8.
  • ·          A visual graph depicting scenarios 1 and 3; base your answer on the 7.2.1 and 7.2.2 charts. Create the charts using actual numbers.

Deficiencies Creating a Lost Generation of Business Writers

Refer to “Are Writing Deficiencies Creating a Lost Generation of Business Writers?”

Write a 250-500-word summary of the article.

Refer to the guidelines for writing an effective summary presented in the Topic 2 Lecture for use as a guide. Review the assignment rubric as well prior to beginning the assignment.

Be sure to include a discussion of the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

 

original work please , I see that there are alot of papers on here from Grand Canyon University, plagerism free and as long as the word count is over 250 and Be sure to include a discussion of the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors.

Refer to “Are Writing Deficiencies Creating a Lost Generation of Business Writers?”

Write a 250-500-word summary of the article.

Refer to the guidelines for writing an effective summary presented in the Topic 2 Lecture for use as a guide. Review the assignment rubric as well prior to beginning the assignment.

Be sure to include a discussion of the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

 

original work please , I see that there are alot of papers on here from Grand Canyon University, plagerism free and as long as the word count is over 250 and Be sure to include a discussion of the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors.

Discuss on Quantative analysis

I MUST have a Decision Tree included with this homework assignment.  In order to do the assignment you must have EXCEL QM, QM for Windows or know how to make a decision tree using EXCEL it can not be handwritten.   I have attached also a partial solution for the decision tree.  It must line up with this partial solution from my Instructor.

Thank you so MUCH!!!

I MUST have a Decision Tree included with this homework assignment.  In order to do the assignment you must have EXCEL QM, QM for Windows or know how to make a decision tree using EXCEL it can not be handwritten.   I have attached also a partial solution for the decision tree.  It must line up with this partial solution from my Instructor.

Thank you so MUCH!!!

discuss on Project Management

Please, find the instructions in the attached “instructions” documet.

Read the instructions before offering to do the work.

APA Style.

Original Work Only.

No Plagirism.

Reference the textbook (attached).

The 2 templates mentioned in the instructions are attached. Download them and use them as per the instructions.

Project Management Experts Only

Please, find the instructions in the attached “instructions” documet.

Read the instructions before offering to do the work.

APA Style.

Original Work Only.

No Plagirism.

Reference the textbook (attached).

The 2 templates mentioned in the instructions are attached. Download them and use them as per the instructions.

Project Management Experts Only

Proposal A Team Approach To Achieve A Long-Term Business Goal.

Develop a slide presentation that includes the following:

  • Title slide – remember that this is being presented to the executive team.
  • Introduction – Be sure to introduce the reason you are proposing a team approach by identifying the long-term business goal you desire to achieve.
  • Actions for the organization level – Identify which of the 7 actions are appropriately established and which need to be revised or developed.
  • Actions at the leader level – Using the 12 actions that leaders can take as a model, identify three strengths that seem generally consistent among leaders in the organization and three opportunities for development.
  • Recommendations – Using persuasive language and negotiating skills
    • Make recommendations for policy and structure changes to better enable the successful deployment of a team approach.
    • Make recommendations for leader training and development to help the team approach succeed.
    • Conclude with a call to action that seeks sponsorship and support for this initiative.
    • Develop a slide presentation that includes the following:
      • Title slide – remember that this is being presented to the executive team.
      • Introduction – Be sure to introduce the reason you are proposing a team approach by identifying the long-term business goal you desire to achieve.
      • Actions for the organization level – Identify which of the 7 actions are appropriately established and which need to be revised or developed.
      • Actions at the leader level – Using the 12 actions that leaders can take as a model, identify three strengths that seem generally consistent among leaders in the organization and three opportunities for development.
      • Recommendations – Using persuasive language and negotiating skills
        • Make recommendations for policy and structure changes to better enable the successful deployment of a team approach.
        • Make recommendations for leader training and development to help the team approach succeed.
        • Conclude with a call to action that seeks sponsorship and support for this initiative.

Legal & Ethical Issues In Business Organizations

1.   Barry Engel was president of Gel Spice Company, which imported, processed, and packaged spices. As president, he was responsible for the purchasing and storing of spices in the company’s warehouse in Brooklyn, New York. In June 1972, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspected the Gel Spice warehouse and found widespread  rodent infestation. Upon reinspection in August 1972, the FDA found evidence of continuing infestation. Following the two 1972 inspections, the FDA considered a criminal prosecution against Gel Spice. Before referring the case to the Department of Justice, however, the FDA conducted an additional inspection. At that July 1973 inspection, no evidence of rodent infestation was found, and the criminal prosecution was dropped. Three years later, in July 1976, the FDA inspected Gel Spice and again found active rodent infestation. Four additional inspections were performed from 1977 to 1979, each of which revealed continuing infestation. Thereafter, the government instituted criminal proceedings against Gel Spice and its president, Barry Engel. Under what theory of criminal liability could Engel be held liable for violating the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act? Can Engel successfully assert any defense? [United States v. Gel Spice Co., 773 F.2d 427 (2d Cir. 1985).]

2.  Read “The Responsible Manager” on Pages 1026-1027of the Bagley Text (International Law and Transactions).  Read “A Manager’s Dilemma” on page 1028 and answer the following questions:

http://s1.downloadmienphi.net/file/downloadfile7/149/1379786.pdf

 

1.  Is the conduct of these international drug companies ethical?
2.  Should it matter whether consumers in a developing country cannot afford the products being tested?

 

3.  Darleen Johnson was driving her Ford car under rainy conditions on a two-lane highway through Missouri. The car’s front tires had a reasonable amount of tread remaining on them, but the back tires were nearly bald. For an undetermined reason, Johnson lost control of the car, spun into the other lane, and collided with a pickup truck driven by Kathyleen Sammons. Johnson was killed instantly  Johnson’s father claimed that the inboard C.V. joint boot on the front axle was torn, which allowed debris to contaminate the joint. (The boot is a covering that contains the grease that lubricates the joint.) This contamination allegedly made the joint act like a brake on the left front wheel and caused Johnson’s car to pivot around that wheel and into the path of the oncoming pickup truck. Ford admits that the joint boot can become torn, which will allow contamination of the joint. In its manuals, Ford recommends periodic inspection of the boots. However, Ford contends that the joint on Johnson’s car was contaminated during or after the accident. Ford also contends that contamination of the joint could not result in the joint seizing and creating a loss of steering control, and that the worst that could result from contamination would be some vibration and noise. According to Ford, Johnson’s accident was caused by road conditions and driving error. The case is submitted to the jury on theories of strict liability and negligent design and manufacture.

Was Ford liable for Johnson’s death?

Was it ethical for Ford to not disclose the defect?

What do you think would have been the best way for Ford to disclose the defect, if you think it should have?

What is the best one additional argument that Ford could have raised in its defense.  Thoroughly explain the rationale for your answers.

4.  Hewlett-Packard (HP) launched a workplace diversity campaign that consisted of hanging posters entitled “Diversity Is Our Strength.” Each poster depicted an HP employee above the caption “Black,” “Blonde,” “Old,” “Gay,” or “Hispanic.” In response to the “Gay” posters, employee Richard Peterson, a self-described “devout Christian” who believes homosexual activities violate the commandments in the Bible, posted two biblical passages  on an overhead bin in his work cubicle. One stated: “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be put upon them.’ Leviticus 20:13.” Peterson’s direct supervisor removed the postings after she determined that they violated HP’s policy prohibiting harassment, which stated: “Any comments or conduct relating to a person’s race, gender, religion, disability, age, sexual orientation, or ethnic background that fail to respect the dignity and feeling [sic] of the individual are unacceptable.” Peterson informed management that HP’s diversity campaign was an initiative to “target” heterosexual and fundamentalist Christian employees by condoning homosexuality. Peterson once again posted the verses in his cubicle and stated that he would not remove them unless HP removed the “Gay” posters. Peterson was subsequently terminated for insubordination.

Does Peterson have a valid claim of religious discrimination against HP?

Do Peterson’s gay coworkers have a claim against HP for Peterson’s postings?

Administrative Ethics Master’s Level Class

Students will be expected to write a 15 page term paper due at the end of week seven. Students will choose a case of real world ethical quandary in business or political administration, subject to by approval. The paper will include research about the case (What happened? Why does this case matter?) and the student’s account what mistakes were made, how ethics should have led to a different course of action and what we should learn from the case as a whole.

Below is the outline for the paper:

 

Title: Approaching the Presidency Roosevelt and Taft

Thesis: Approaching the presidency describes the Roosevelt and Taft models of presidency and the differences they had on the ethical issues on the responsibilities of a president

I. Introduction

A. Give an overview of the models of presidency of Roosevelt and Taft.

B. Thesis: Approaching the Presidency described the different views of issues concerning the presidency of Roosevelt and Taft and also some differences that arise in the models of presidency.

II. Describe Roosevelt model of presidency

A. Explain the Roosevelt views on the responsibilities of a president.

B. Explain the negotiation line of Roosevelt in line of law and ethics

III. Describe Taft model of presidency

A. Stipulate Taft’s views on the responsibilities of a president.

B. Explain the negotiation line of Taft in the line of law and ethics.

IV. Describe the actions of Roosevelt and Taft on the case of the U.S steel

V. Stipulate the differences between the models of presidency

A.  Views of Roosevelt and Taft on the responsibilities of a president.

B. Negotiation in the line between law and ethics

C. Actions in the case of the U.S steel

VI. Describe a leader whose model of presidency is similar to that of Roosevelt and Taft and the effects of this model to the political actions of the leader

VII. Conclusion

A. Thesis

B. Summarize Roosevelt and Taft model of presidency

C. Summarize the differences in the two models of presidency

Below is the introduction to the 15 page paper:

The presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt began on March 4, 1993 (when he was assumed presidency as the 32nd President of the United States) and ended on April 12, 1945 (upon his death).  Roosevelt assumed the presidency during the Great Depression. He introduced New Deal program for relief (government jobs for the unemployed), recovery (economic growth) and reform (regulation of transportation, bank and Wall Street). It involved expansion of the role of federal government in the economy.  His leadership created many programs to support farmers and the unemployed, regulate business and high finance, and encourage growth of labor union (Abbott, 1990).

Roosevelt’s presidency brought dramatic change in the American society. The leadership rescued them from Great Depression and greatest global conflict.  Roosevelt pursued social justice and challenged American capitalism. He conquered fear that was brought by falls of Great Depression which included collapse of banks and lack of confidence in business. Roosevelt revolutionized the art of political campaign and created national majority that absorbed those who were excluded in the political process. He sought economic recovery with the National Recovery Administration. Regulatory reforms presided over the end of prohibition and instituted reforms in labor, communication and finance. The New Deal ensured that major legislations and programs were implemented. The leadership participated actively in the economic life of the country (Burke, 2000).

The presidency of William Howard Taft began on March 4, 1909 t and ended on March 4, 1913. President Roosevelt had set a great legacy for the American presidency. This created difficult for William Howard Taft to live up to the legacy. Roosevelt was his mentor and friend but he disappointed him by abandoning the Republican Party and forming Bull-Moose party. This created for an opportunity for Woodrow Wilson who was a Democrat to win presidential election of 1912. Taft’s ambition was to become Chief Justice of the United States. After leaving the presidency, he was appointed as Chief Justice. Taft’s presidency was more judicial administration than presidential. He was more comfortable executing the existing law than demanding new legislation from Congress (Herring, 2017).

Taft made an effort of leading Congress to low tariffs but the Congress was dominated by traditional interests of high tariff. He became more conservative and this made him to force chief of forestry to resign.  He continued the goal of Roosevelt of expanding US foreign trade in Asia, Central America and South. His dream was becoming the chief justice. He was uncomfortable with politics since he had tendency of contemplating every side. Taft’s presidency could be termed as failure based on his shift from trust busting program to reactionary conservatism. The only achievements he made were organization and conduct of the executive branch and development of anti-trust policy.

Based on the issues described about presidency of Roosevelt and Taft, Roosevelt was a successful politician who made various programs that rescued America from Great Depression and great wars. Taft was a more successful administrator than politician. He lacked presidential power and he was ambitious of serving in United States as Chief Justice.  He served severally in political appointments until he became president and later got his ambitious position of Chief Justice.  Taft was more conservative than Roosevelt.

Roosevelt believed that the president had duty to do everything the nation demanded so long as it was not forbidden by law. He believed that he served the people and not the government. Taft’s leadership was based on strict constructionist model of presidency. Under this approach, President has no right to act unless granted by the Congress. Taft looked at the facts of the situation and acted based on evidence. On the other hand, Roosevelt acted based on what he felt was right (Mayer, 2002).

 

References

Abbott, P. (1990). The exemplary presidency: Franklin D. Roosevelt and the American political tradition. Univ of Massachusetts Press.

Burke, J. P. (2000). The institutional presidency: Organizing and managing the White House from FDR to Clinton. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Herring, P. (2017). Presidential Leadership: The Political Relations of Congress and the Chief Executive. Routledge.

Mayer, K. (2002). With the stroke of a pen: Executive orders and presidential power. Princeton University Press.

Legal & Ethical Issues In Business Organizations

1.   Barry Engel was president of Gel Spice Company, which imported, processed, and packaged spices. As president, he was responsible for the purchasing and storing of spices in the company’s warehouse in Brooklyn, New York. In June 1972, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspected the Gel Spice warehouse and found widespread  rodent infestation. Upon reinspection in August 1972, the FDA found evidence of continuing infestation. Following the two 1972 inspections, the FDA considered a criminal prosecution against Gel Spice. Before referring the case to the Department of Justice, however, the FDA conducted an additional inspection. At that July 1973 inspection, no evidence of rodent infestation was found, and the criminal prosecution was dropped. Three years later, in July 1976, the FDA inspected Gel Spice and again found active rodent infestation. Four additional inspections were performed from 1977 to 1979, each of which revealed continuing infestation. Thereafter, the government instituted criminal proceedings against Gel Spice and its president, Barry Engel. Under what theory of criminal liability could Engel be held liable for violating the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act? Can Engel successfully assert any defense? [United States v. Gel Spice Co., 773 F.2d 427 (2d Cir. 1985).]

2.  Read “The Responsible Manager” on Pages 1026-1027of the Bagley Text (International Law and Transactions).  Read “A Manager’s Dilemma” on page 1028 and answer the following questions:

http://s1.downloadmienphi.net/file/downloadfile7/149/1379786.pdf

 

1.  Is the conduct of these international drug companies ethical?
2.  Should it matter whether consumers in a developing country cannot afford the products being tested?

 

3.  Darleen Johnson was driving her Ford car under rainy conditions on a two-lane highway through Missouri. The car’s front tires had a reasonable amount of tread remaining on them, but the back tires were nearly bald. For an undetermined reason, Johnson lost control of the car, spun into the other lane, and collided with a pickup truck driven by Kathyleen Sammons. Johnson was killed instantly  Johnson’s father claimed that the inboard C.V. joint boot on the front axle was torn, which allowed debris to contaminate the joint. (The boot is a covering that contains the grease that lubricates the joint.) This contamination allegedly made the joint act like a brake on the left front wheel and caused Johnson’s car to pivot around that wheel and into the path of the oncoming pickup truck. Ford admits that the joint boot can become torn, which will allow contamination of the joint. In its manuals, Ford recommends periodic inspection of the boots. However, Ford contends that the joint on Johnson’s car was contaminated during or after the accident. Ford also contends that contamination of the joint could not result in the joint seizing and creating a loss of steering control, and that the worst that could result from contamination would be some vibration and noise. According to Ford, Johnson’s accident was caused by road conditions and driving error. The case is submitted to the jury on theories of strict liability and negligent design and manufacture.

Was Ford liable for Johnson’s death?

Was it ethical for Ford to not disclose the defect?

What do you think would have been the best way for Ford to disclose the defect, if you think it should have?

What is the best one additional argument that Ford could have raised in its defense.  Thoroughly explain the rationale for your answers.

4.  Hewlett-Packard (HP) launched a workplace diversity campaign that consisted of hanging posters entitled “Diversity Is Our Strength.” Each poster depicted an HP employee above the caption “Black,” “Blonde,” “Old,” “Gay,” or “Hispanic.” In response to the “Gay” posters, employee Richard Peterson, a self-described “devout Christian” who believes homosexual activities violate the commandments in the Bible, posted two biblical passages  on an overhead bin in his work cubicle. One stated: “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be put upon them.’ Leviticus 20:13.” Peterson’s direct supervisor removed the postings after she determined that they violated HP’s policy prohibiting harassment, which stated: “Any comments or conduct relating to a person’s race, gender, religion, disability, age, sexual orientation, or ethnic background that fail to respect the dignity and feeling [sic] of the individual are unacceptable.” Peterson informed management that HP’s diversity campaign was an initiative to “target” heterosexual and fundamentalist Christian employees by condoning homosexuality. Peterson once again posted the verses in his cubicle and stated that he would not remove them unless HP removed the “Gay” posters. Peterson was subsequently terminated for insubordination.

Does Peterson have a valid claim of religious discrimination against HP?

Do Peterson’s gay coworkers have a claim against HP for Peterson’s postings?

Discuss on Administrative Ethics

Students will be expected to write a 15 page term paper due at the end of week seven. Students will choose a case of real world ethical quandary in business or political administration, subject to by approval. The paper will include research about the case (What happened? Why does this case matter?) and the student’s account what mistakes were made, how ethics should have led to a different course of action and what we should learn from the case as a whole.

Below is the outline for the paper:

 

Title: Approaching the Presidency Roosevelt and Taft

Thesis: Approaching the presidency describes the Roosevelt and Taft models of presidency and the differences they had on the ethical issues on the responsibilities of a president

I. Introduction

A. Give an overview of the models of presidency of Roosevelt and Taft.

B. Thesis: Approaching the Presidency described the different views of issues concerning the presidency of Roosevelt and Taft and also some differences that arise in the models of presidency.

II. Describe Roosevelt model of presidency

A. Explain the Roosevelt views on the responsibilities of a president.

B. Explain the negotiation line of Roosevelt in line of law and ethics

III. Describe Taft model of presidency

A. Stipulate Taft’s views on the responsibilities of a president.

B. Explain the negotiation line of Taft in the line of law and ethics.

IV. Describe the actions of Roosevelt and Taft on the case of the U.S steel

V. Stipulate the differences between the models of presidency

A.  Views of Roosevelt and Taft on the responsibilities of a president.

B. Negotiation in the line between law and ethics

C. Actions in the case of the U.S steel

VI. Describe a leader whose model of presidency is similar to that of Roosevelt and Taft and the effects of this model to the political actions of the leader

VII. Conclusion

A. Thesis

B. Summarize Roosevelt and Taft model of presidency

C. Summarize the differences in the two models of presidency

Below is the introduction to the 15 page paper:

The presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt began on March 4, 1993 (when he was assumed presidency as the 32nd President of the United States) and ended on April 12, 1945 (upon his death).  Roosevelt assumed the presidency during the Great Depression. He introduced New Deal program for relief (government jobs for the unemployed), recovery (economic growth) and reform (regulation of transportation, bank and Wall Street). It involved expansion of the role of federal government in the economy.  His leadership created many programs to support farmers and the unemployed, regulate business and high finance, and encourage growth of labor union (Abbott, 1990).

Roosevelt’s presidency brought dramatic change in the American society. The leadership rescued them from Great Depression and greatest global conflict.  Roosevelt pursued social justice and challenged American capitalism. He conquered fear that was brought by falls of Great Depression which included collapse of banks and lack of confidence in business. Roosevelt revolutionized the art of political campaign and created national majority that absorbed those who were excluded in the political process. He sought economic recovery with the National Recovery Administration. Regulatory reforms presided over the end of prohibition and instituted reforms in labor, communication and finance. The New Deal ensured that major legislations and programs were implemented. The leadership participated actively in the economic life of the country (Burke, 2000).

The presidency of William Howard Taft began on March 4, 1909 t and ended on March 4, 1913. President Roosevelt had set a great legacy for the American presidency. This created difficult for William Howard Taft to live up to the legacy. Roosevelt was his mentor and friend but he disappointed him by abandoning the Republican Party and forming Bull-Moose party. This created for an opportunity for Woodrow Wilson who was a Democrat to win presidential election of 1912. Taft’s ambition was to become Chief Justice of the United States. After leaving the presidency, he was appointed as Chief Justice. Taft’s presidency was more judicial administration than presidential. He was more comfortable executing the existing law than demanding new legislation from Congress (Herring, 2017).

Taft made an effort of leading Congress to low tariffs but the Congress was dominated by traditional interests of high tariff. He became more conservative and this made him to force chief of forestry to resign.  He continued the goal of Roosevelt of expanding US foreign trade in Asia, Central America and South. His dream was becoming the chief justice. He was uncomfortable with politics since he had tendency of contemplating every side. Taft’s presidency could be termed as failure based on his shift from trust busting program to reactionary conservatism. The only achievements he made were organization and conduct of the executive branch and development of anti-trust policy.

Based on the issues described about presidency of Roosevelt and Taft, Roosevelt was a successful politician who made various programs that rescued America from Great Depression and great wars. Taft was a more successful administrator than politician. He lacked presidential power and he was ambitious of serving in United States as Chief Justice.  He served severally in political appointments until he became president and later got his ambitious position of Chief Justice.  Taft was more conservative than Roosevelt.

Roosevelt believed that the president had duty to do everything the nation demanded so long as it was not forbidden by law. He believed that he served the people and not the government. Taft’s leadership was based on strict constructionist model of presidency. Under this approach, President has no right to act unless granted by the Congress. Taft looked at the facts of the situation and acted based on evidence. On the other hand, Roosevelt acted based on what he felt was right (Mayer, 2002)