Why did women take such a prominent role in the reform movement?

Why did women take such a prominent role in the reform movement?

For this Discussion, answer one of the instructor-provided questions b  You are also required to answer a follow-up question which will be provided friday may 7

answer should be atleast 10 sentences.

1.  Choose one of the effects of the Second Great Awakening and discuss.

2.  Why did women take such a prominent role in the reform movement?

3.  When and why did the South move from seeing slavery as a necessary evil to seeing it as a good thing?

4.  How effective were the abolitionists in achieving their goals during this time?

Identify the four juvenile legal issues the decision directly addressed and offer your opinion as to the significance each has on a juvenile’s due process rights.

Identify the four juvenile legal issues the decision directly addressed and offer your opinion as to the significance each has on a juvenile’s due process rights.

Some might argue that the Gault decision sent a wake-up call to the juvenile justice system, which went virtually unchallenged (legally speaking) between the creation of the first court in 1899 and the 1960’s. After reading the summary of the In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 case in Unit Readings & Resources, discuss the significance the decision had to juvenile legal proceedings. Identify the four juvenile legal issues the decision directly addressed and offer your opinion as to the significance each has on a juvenile’s due process rights.

In what ways are victimology and criminology similar

Chapter 1: Discussion

In what ways are victimology and criminology similar, and in what ways do they differ?  Give several examples of research questions that victimologists find interesting and the kinds of studies they carry out?

Make sure to:

  • Write a short essay or paragraph of at least 300 words (not including reference information). You must put the word count at the end of your discussion.
  • Use concrete examples/details and avoid generalities.
  • You must use your textbook in your answer and you need to use one additional source (not a dictionary-like source).
  • Address all questions.
  • You must cite your additional source APA style and give the reference at the end of your discussion.
  • Use proper grammar and punctuation.
  • Do not plagiarize.

Analyze the argument to “defund the police.

Analyze the argument to “defund the police.” Give at least 5 pros and 5 cons to “defunding the police.”

Your ppt presentation should not include links to videos, pictures or large sections of quotes. Your presentation should be clear, be AT LEAST 20 slides of content (excluding title and reference slides) and should include a proper title card and all references on the final slid

What types of legal claims could Paula make against Cash Mart and Geoffrey?

In this assignment, you’ll need to decide whether Paula Plaintiff has any legal claims arising from a series of unfortunate events. After reading the scenario, answer the questions that follow, making sure to fully explain the basis of your decision.

Paula Plaintiff is shopping at her favorite store, Cash Mart. She is looking for a new laptop, but she can’t find one she likes. Then, realizing that she is going to be late for an appointment, she attempts to leave the store, walking very fast. However, before she can leave, she is stopped by a security guard who accuses her of shoplifting. Paula, who has taken nothing, denies any wrong doing. The officer insists and takes Paula to a small room in the back of the store. The guard tells Paula that if she attempts to leave the room she will be arrested and sent to jail. At this point, the guard leaves the room. Paula is scared and waits in the room for over an hour until the manager comes in and apologizes and tells Paula that she is free to go.

About this same time, Geoffrey Golfer is hitting golf balls in his backyard. Geoffrey decides to break out his new driver and hits a golf ball out of his backyard into the Cash Mart parking lot. The golf ball hits Paula Plaintiff on the head and knocks her unconscious just as she is leaving the store.

Instructions
In a 6–10 paragraph paper, answer the following questions:
What types of legal claims could Paula make against Cash Mart and Geoffrey?
Consider the following:
What are the possible tort claims that Paula can make against Cash Mart? Discuss the elements of the claim and how those elements relate to the facts in the scenario.
Was Geoffrey negligent when he hit the golf ball that injured Paula? Discuss the elements of negligence and use facts from the scenario to support your decision.
If Paula files a negligence claim against Geoffrey will she file in civil court or criminal court? Explain the difference between civil court and criminal court.

Negligence and product liability

Negligence and product liability are two of our main topics for this week. Negligence is an unintentional tort because it happens by accident. Product liability arises when one is injured by a defective product.

Consider the scenarios below. Choose one and determine if it describes negligence or product liability. Explain your answer and be sure to discuss the elements of any claims that may arise.

  • Daisy is driving in her car when her phone chimes. She picks up her phone and sees a text from her friend. While responding to the text, Daisy runs a red light and causes an accident.
  • Janet just moved from Florida to Minnesota and is enjoying the scenery of a beautiful snowfall when she sees a person slip and fall on the ice on the sidewalk in front of her house.
  • Larry is a lumberjack. He decides to purchase a new chainsaw. The first time Larry uses the chainsaw, the product malfunctions and Larry is injured.

Determine whether Mr. Johnson discriminated against Ms. Djarra based on religion.

Assume the role of the judge in the Dress Code Flips Burger Joint case. Analyze the legal issues presented by the parties and state how you would rule on each of the issues presented. Remember that your ruling should be based on your legal analysis and not on your own personal views. Use the IRAC method to apply the law to the facts and reach a legal conclusion based on your analysis.

Your legal analysis should

  • Determine whether Mr. Johnson discriminated against Ms. Djarra based on religion.
  • Discuss whether Mr. Johnson offered reasonable accommodations to Ms. Djarra.
  • Identify the amount and type of damages to be awarded, if any.

The Religious Discrimination – Reasonable Accommodations analysis

Touchstone: Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car?

Touchstone: Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car?

SCCENARIO: Jim and Laura Buyer visit the local car dealership because they are interested in buying a new car. The car they currently have is aging and is starting to have mechanical problems. Jim and Laura would share the new car, and use it to go back and forth to work and school. Before going to the dealership, Jim and Laura decide that they can only afford $400.00 a month in car payments.

Once at the car dealership, Jim and Laura meet Stan Salesman. Stan shows them several vehicles and Jim and Laura test-drive several of the cars. Jim and Laura particularly like the blue 4-door sedan. Therefore, they agree to give Stan Salesman a $100.00 deposit to hold the car for a day. Stan Salesman does not give them the receipt but guarantees that the $100.00 is refundable. No documents were signed.

The next day, Stan Salesman calls Jim and Laura to ask them when they would like to take delivery of the car. Jim and Laura, on the way home from the dealership, decided that they were not going to buy the car because they did not want to spend that money each month. Therefore, Jim and Laura tell Stan Salesman that they have decided not to buy the car and request their $100.00 deposit back.

Stan insists that the $100.00 was a deposit on the car and was meant to be part of the contract to buy the car. Stan is very persistent and insistent that Jim and Laura have contracted to buy the car; therefore, the $100.00 will be applied to the purchase price of the car. Jim and Laura are shocked and angry as not only do they not want to spend the money, but now feel as though they are being duped by Stan Salesman.

Jim and Laura have an appointment to see a lawyer in a few days, but know you are a student taking a business law class and come to you for advice. They are very frazzled, and understandably upset that they may have just purchased a car. Since you have been taking business law, you have read and understand the elements of a contract and the defenses to a contract. Therefore, although you are not a lawyer, you provide some basic advice from what you’ve learned in your business law class.

ASSIGNMENT: In three to five (3-5) pages, advise Jim and Laura based on the above facts as presented, the material provided in the text, and material covered in the lecture. In your paper, be sure to address the following:

  1. Define the elements of a legal contract using examples from the scenario where applicable.
  2. Decide whether or not there was a contract for the purchase of the automobile.
  3. Identify the facts from the scenario which support your decision on whether or not a contract exists for the purchase of the automobile.
  4. Use at least two (2) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as quality academic resources.

In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the touchstone.

A. Assignment Guidelines

DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

1. Understanding of Contract Law

❒ Have you defined the elements of a legal contract?❒ Have you used examples from the scenario to illustrate these elements?

2. Case Judgment and Support

❒ Have you provided a judgment on the existence of a contract in this scenario?❒ Have you used specific examples from the scenario to defend your position?

3. Research

❒ Have you referenced at least two academic sources in your essay?❒ Have you explained how each source relates to and supports your judgment on the case?

History of the policy

PLEASE FOLLOW INSTRUSTIONS

For this assignment you are to prepare a ten (10) page report about one written policy used in your field agency.  If you are placed in Child Welfare Services, describe a written policy used in Child Protective Services.  You should chose at least two (2) articles from professional social work journals that address the policy you are analyzing either directly or indirectly and integrate them into your paper and presentation.  You should prepare a list (cited in proper APA style) of all materials you used in your report and bring a list of the references to share with your seminar colleagues.

Your report should include the following components:

1. The Policy

2. History of the policy (When the policy was made; who made the policy  (national, state, local, agency); Why the policy was made; How the policy has been implemented within your agency)

3. Why you chose this policy to analyze (If Applicable)

4. The process you used to analyze the policy (What sources you used inside the agency; what sources of information you used outside the agency; how you made decisions about source analysis)

5. Considerations Related to Values (Is the policy generally compatible with Contemporary Society? Is the policy compatible with important and enduring cultural values, particularly equality, fairness, and justice? Is the policy compatible with social work’s professional values and ethical system?)

6. Dimensions of Influence (Is the policy acceptable to those in formal  decision making positions?  Does the policy satisfy relevant interest groups?

7. Knowledge Considerations (Is the policy based on knowledge that has been tested to some degree? Is the policy workable? That is, can the programs that flow from the policy be carried out in the real world? Does the policy create few problems for both the public and the intended beneficiaries?)

8. Elements related to Costs and Benefits (Is the policy reasonably effective? Is the policy efficient?

9. Summary Statements

legal elements of negligent hiring.

Superior Electrical (Superior) was in the business of installing electrical wiring and related components at new construction sites. Because some employees were assigned company vehicles equipped with company tools and materials and were expected to drive those vehicles to the work sites, Superior required all employment applicants to hold a valid driver’s license. Employees who were assigned a company vehicle were expected to drive for the company during the workday in order to transport job materials and company tools that were kept on the vehicle to job sites. These employees were expected to take the company issued vehicle home at the end of the work day.

Superior hired Cory Jones as an apprentice electrician. Jones had completed an employment application in which he stated that he had a valid driver’s license and had not been cited for any traffic violations. These statements were untrue. His license had been suspended because of numerous traffic violations, including careless driving and driving without a license. Superior did not check on his driving record at the time he was hired because, as an apprentice electrician, he was not being assigned a company vehicle and was not expected to drive for the company during the work day.

About a year after hiring Jones, Superior promoted him to electrician and assigned Jones a company vehicle equipped with a rack for transporting wiring and other materials to and from the work sites. Superior intended that Jones drive during the day for the company and to take the vehicle home after the end of the work day. On a later date, when Jones’s work hours had ended and he was driving home in the company vehicle, he collided with two cars. The collision resulted solely from Jones’s negligence. Carolyn Carson and her son were severely injured in the collision and they sued Superior. The Carson’s alleged two theories of recovery against Superior: respondeat superior and negligent hiring.

Write a four- to five-page paper (not including title and references pages) that addresses the following:

  • Identify and discuss the legal elements of negligent hiring.
  • Apply those elements of negligent hiring to the facts given in the case.
  • Analyze whether Superior would be liable for negligent hiring.
  • Identify and discuss the legal elements of respondeat superior.
  • Apply those elements of respondeat superior to the facts given in the case.
  • Analyze whether Superior would be liable on respondeat superior grounds.

The Negligent Tort Liability paper

  • Must be four to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.) resource.