Child-Initiated Development and Learning Newsletter
Assessment Description
As an educator, what you do to guide young children into initiating their own development and learning is crucial.
For this assignment, create a 1-2 page newsletter to give to the parents at your Birth to Pre-K center. Consider GCU’s Statement on the Integration of Faith and Work that states, “Therefore, we are assured that our work within the world matters to God and our neighbors, and that we honor God by serving others in ways that promote human flourishing, as you introduce yourself and tell the families a little about yourself in the newsletter and discuss the importance of child-initiated development and learning particular to children from Birth through Pre-K.
In addition, discuss what you, their child’s educator, will do to guide the young children into initiating their own development and learning. Be sure to include in the discussion the following:
- The importance of individual and group guidance in the development of children ages Birth to Pre-K.
- Problem-solving techniques that help young children develop supportive relationships.
- Strategies to facilitate child-initiated development and learning.
Support your findings with 3-5 scholarly resources
rubric for assignment
Guidance
8 points
Criteria Description
Guidance
5. Target
8 points
Newsletter includes a comprehensive and in-depth explanation of how individual and group guidance is important for development and learning in children ages Birth to Pre-K.
4. Acceptable
6.96 points
Newsletter includes a clear and descriptive explanation of how individual and group guidance is important for development and learning in children ages Birth to Pre-K.
3. Approaching
5.92 points
Newsletter vaguely describes how individual and group guidance is important for development and learning in children ages Birth to Pre-K.
2. Insufficient
5.52 points
Newsletter provides incomplete or irrelevant information on individual and group guidance.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
collapse Problem-Solving Techniques assessment
Problem-Solving Techniques
8 points
Criteria Description
Problem-Solving Techniques
5. Target
8 points
Problem-solving techniques that help young children develop supportive relationships are thoroughly and proficiently explained.
4. Acceptable
6.96 points
Problem-solving techniques that help young children develop supportive relationships are logically and appropriately explained.
3. Approaching
5.92 points
Problem-solving techniques that help young children develop supportive relationships are vague and inconsistent.
2. Insufficient
5.52 points
Problem-solving techniques that help young children develop supportive relationships are incomplete or inappropriate for the learners.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
collapse Strategies assessment
Strategies
12 points
Criteria Description
Strategies
5. Target
12 points
Strategies to facilitate child-initiated development and learning are well-crafted and exceptionally explained.
4. Acceptable
10.44 points
Strategies to facilitate child-initiated development and learning are detailed and clearly explained.
3. Approaching
8.88 points
Strategies to facilitate child-initiated development and learning are applicable, but lacking substantive explanation.
2. Insufficient
8.28 points
Strategies to facilitate child-initiated development and learning are incomplete or unrealistic.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
collapse Aesthetic Quality assessment
Aesthetic Quality
4 points
Criteria Description
Aesthetic Quality
5. Target
4 points
Design is professional, visually appealing and clearly catered to the audience. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation.
4. Acceptable
3.48 points
Design is clean and audience is apparent. Purposeful integration of appropriate objects, charts, and/or graphs supports the message and enhance the presentation.
3. Approaching
2.96 points
Design is fairly clean, with some exceptions. Audience may not be readily apparent. Visuals do not fully support the message.
2. Insufficient
2.76 points
Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, or busy. Little to no creativity or inventiveness is present.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
collapse Mechanics of Writing assessment
Mechanics of Writing
4 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Target
4 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Acceptable
3.48 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. Approaching
2.96 points
Mechanical errors or typos are present, and can be distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are inconsistent.
2. Insufficient
2.76 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
collapse Documentation of Sources assessment
Documentation of Sources
4 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Target
4 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Acceptable
3.48 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Approaching
2.96 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors are present.
2. Insufficient
2.76 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.