Factual representation about a product or service.
LEG 500 Final Exam Part 1 and 2
LEG500 Final Exam Part 1 and 2, LEG 500 Week 11 Final Exam Part 1 and 2
Question 1
1.
Under the ___________ plan, the EPA auctions a set number of sulfur dioxide emission allowances annually, with each allowance permitting one ton of emissions.
Answer
allocation of resources
tradeable permit
green capitalism
shareholder activism
Question 2
1.
Which of the following are permissible uses of power of eminent domain.
Answer
The government taking private property to transfer to a private company for development of a strip mall.
The government taking private property to build a highway.
The government taking private property to expand an airport.
All of the above
Question 3
1.
Eminent Domain is a practice governed under the _____ Amendment to the constitution.
Answer
10th
5th
22nd
1st
Question 4
1.
According to law professor Thomas Joo, the best group of persons for addressing the environmental concerns facing the world today is:
Answer
Shareholders
Directors and Officers
Environmentalists
The Government
Question 5
1.
Eminent domain permits the “taking” of private property by the government under the following circumstances.
Answer
When there is valid “public use” for the property and the government pays the property owner “just compensation”.
When there is either a valid “public use” or “private use” for the property.
When there is a valid “public use” for the property and the government pays fair market value for the property.
Only in circumstances where there government has paid fair market value for a piece of property.
Question 6
1.
Which of the following are examples of significant environmental regulation passed by the Federal Government.
Answer
The Clean Air Act
The Resource and Recovery Act
The National Environmental Property Act
All of the above
None of the above
Question 7
1.
To succeed under the The Lanham Act, a plaintiff must prove which of the following
Answer
That the defendant made a factual misrepresentation about a product or service.
That the defendant “puffed” up various representations about a product or service.
That the defendant made a factual representation about a product or service.
All of the above.