The topic is the impact AI (Artificial Intelligence) will have on your area of study

MGMT 4102 OB – Individual Written Research Work Instructions and Topic

Each student will individually research and write a research work no less than 10 pages but longer if necessary.

The topic is the impact AI (Artificial Intelligence) will have on your area of study, i.e. your academic major.

If your major is Accounting, your work will be on ‘AI Impact on Accounting.’

If your major is General Business, your work will be on ‘AI Impact on US Businesses.’

If not a Business Major or undeclared, your work will be on ‘AI Impact on US Businesses.’

The research work will include a title page/cover sheet, table of contents/outline, main body section, bibliography, and an appendix section if needed.

The 10 pages DO NOT include the title page/cover sheet, table of contents/outline, bibliography, and appendix. Put images, graphs, pictures in appendix section.

The work and any additional files must be in MS Office Software format, i.e., Word, double spaced, one inch margins on all four sides, font and size are Arial 12, and use APA Style.

A zero grade will be given for any work not submitted in MS Office Software format or if the wrong file is submitted.

Grammar Errors. One or more points for each grammatical error will be taken off any course work, i.e. research works, PPT Presentations, short written history assignment help, postings in D2L Discussions, TEAMS, business plans, etc.

Use the following structure for your research work:

Part I – Introduction and Outline, on first page, state topic/title, student name, course name and section number. Put outline on second page. Outline must be detailed phrases or sentences, not single words. (5% of grade)

Part II – Definition, Brief History, Current Situation, Possible Future Growth/Decline. (25%)

Part III – Specific impacts as either threat (negative impact) or opportunity (positive impact), or both, on your area of study, major, i.e., Accounting, Finance, etc. (25% of grade)

Part IV – Strategies (plans of action) state what a professional/leader in your area should do to offset threats and/or take advantage of opportunities. These specific strategies should be both short term (1-3 years) and long term (greater than 3 years). (25% of grade)

Part V – Reflection Section – This is one of the most important sections. Each student must write a small section (4-5 paragraphs) with three parts, at the end of the work.

The three parts are:

1. what you learned about topic from doing the project, i.e., what you found new and/or interesting,

2. what you learned about the process (doing) the project, and

3. how you can use the information learned in 1 and 2 to enhance your professional and personal life. (15% of grade)

Do not just put in facts you learned about the topic, but how knowing these facts will make you a better professional and/or better person. This section is at the end of work but before the Bibliography section.

Part VI – Bibliography. See following for information on the bibliography. (5% of grade)

– Place the bibliography at the end of the work and use APA Style.

– The bibliography must have at least 25 sources, with only 5 being direct internet sites, as most internet sites are not very credible sources. Most internet sites are biased as the sites are made by private businesses, governments, or organizations which favor a certain view https://anyessayhelp.com/assignment-help-service/get-history-assignment-help-from-expert-writers/ .

– DO NOT use any encyclopedia, i.e., Wikipedia, or basic dictionaries for your sources.

– Use academic articles from academic journals (best), professional/business and public magazines/newsworks, books, interviews, government sources, and internet sites.

– Use current sources (less than 10 years old), unless a classic source, i.e., Drucker.

– If you cannot physically go to a library, use the online CSU Library access to articles, books, etc. and through the GIL Member Libraries, nearly 30 Georgia University Libraries.

– Using a library through the internet does not count as an internet source, as the online library is a data base. It is a road to take you to other sources, i.e., books, journal articles, etc assignment help.

– If you use information in an internet site, it counts as a direct internet site, 1 of only 5 allowed.

– If you use information from an article, magazine, or book listed/contained on an internet site, it counts as an article, magazine, or book source.

Due Date and File Submission

– See syllabus for due date and time.

– Title your file: Semester – Section Number – Title – your last name, your first name.

Example: 2021FA – Sec 90 – AI Impact on Accounting – Smith, Judy.

Large Files

– If file is too big for ‘BRIGHTSPACE (D2L/DESIRE 2 LEARN) Assignments’ folder, email through CSU General Email or CSU OneDrive, before the due date. If using CSU OneDrive, give Dr. Garsombke permission. Contact HUB for help with CSU OneDrive.

– Most internet servers are extremely slow in uploading files. Plan for 2-3 hours for large file.

– Student Requests for Extensions of Due Date for any Semester Long Assignments: For any course work that is a semester long project, i.e., Individual Research Works, Group Research Projects, etc., (following CSU Academic Policies) extensions of due dates cannot be granted unless the student can provide official written documentation that the reason, (i.e., medical) which prevented them from completing the work was for the entire semester.

– Grading done during the following 2-3 weeks. After grading completed, final course grades available on date in CSU Academic Calendar.

These guidelines were prepa¬r¬ed by Dr. Thomas Garsombke, 2021. All Rights Res¬er¬v¬ed. No pa¬rt of this wr¬¬¬i¬¬t¬i¬ng may be re¬pr¬o¬duced, stored in a retrieval system, or trans¬m¬i¬t¬t¬ed, in any form or by any me¬a¬ns, ele¬c¬tronic, mec¬hanical, photocopy¬ing, reco¬r¬ding, or ot¬h¬erwi¬se, wit¬h¬out prior written perm¬is¬s¬ion of the author https://anyessayhelp.com/ .

WAYS TO APPROACH THE EXPOSITORY work:

Option 1

Paragraph 1: Hook, introduce the topic, and end with a thesis statement.

Paragraph 2: Background of the issue.

Paragraph 3: Side 1 of the issue (pro, for example).

Paragraph 4: Side 2 of the issue (con, for example).

Paragraph 5: Side 3 (maybe it’s a blend of the sides 1 & 2 or a grey area).

Paragraph 6: Conclusion

Option 2

Paragraph 1: Hook, introduce the topic, and end with a thesis statement.

Paragraph 2: Both pro & con within a subtopic of the issue (ex: school uniforms & gangs)

Paragraph 3: Both pro & con within a subtopic of the issue (ex: school uniforms & cost)

Paragraph 4: Both pro & con within a subtopic of the issue (ex: uniforms & individuality)

Paragraph 5: Conclusion

Remember, a body paragraph is like a container. If you were moving out of your house, you wouldn’t put your forks and socks in the same box, right? Each body paragraph should make a claim about the piece you are writing about. For example, each paragraph might be about a symbol in the work that speaks to the overall theme the work is trying to argue. The structure of that body paragraphs should be:

1. Topic sentence

2. Supporting evidence/quote

3. Explain what that quote means and how it proves the point you are making.

4. Tie this to thesis/show how it applies to the thesis and transitions to next paragraph.

Then, you need a conclusion paragraph that sums up all your main points from the body paragraphs.

Organizer

Thesis statement:

Topic sentence 1:

Evidence:

What that evidence illustrates:

Topic sentence 2:

Evidence:

What that evidence suggests:

Topic sentence 3:

Evidence:

What that evidence means:

Conclusion

Read Textbook: “Statistics: A Tool for Social Research and Data Analysis”, 11th Edition by Joseph F. Healey, Christopher Donoghue and use the PowerPoint slide to answer the following questions. (MUST BE THIS EDIITION)

Chapter 9 & Introduction to Research Ethics

After considering the kinds of research situations in which two sample tests of significance are appropriate, this chapter presents tests of significance for sample means (both large and small samples) and sample proportions. Towards the end of the chapter, we consider the factors that affect the probability of rejecting the null. One of our purposes here is simply to increase awareness and understanding of the hypothesis testing process. More importantly, we want to make the distinction between statistical significance and theoretical and/or practical importance. We hope that by the time students encounter this section, they will be comfortable enough with the overall process to begin to appreciate the strengths and limitations of hypothesis testing. The theme of statistical significance versus importance is picked up again at the end of Chapter 11 and the beginning of Chapter 12 as a way of making the transition from inferential statistics to measures of association.

Learning Objectives

•

o Identify and cite examples of situations in which the two-sample test of hypothesis is appropriate.

o Explain the log of hypothesis testing as applied to the two-sample case.

o Explain the concept of independent random sampling.

o Perform a hypothesis test for two samples means and two sample proportions following the five-step model and correctly interpret the results.

o Explain how each of the factors (especially sample size) affect the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis.

o Use the Student’s t distribution to conduct a hypothesis test on small samples.

o Explain the differences between statistical significance and importance.

o Use SPSS to conduct a test of significance for the difference between sample means.

To complete this assignment, refer to the Scenario from Concept Review 1 – See Assignment which follows this description.

Dr. Banner is the medical director of a kidney treatment center that includes a dialysis center. He has compiled data on the patient compliance with dialysis treatments for his patients. He has identified one group; African American males, aged 40 -60, as having the lowest levels of compliance with dialysis. This group averages 5 missed appointments each month. Dr. Banner conducts a literature review of research on African American males’ compliance with dialysis treatment he found that African American males have the highest level of complications related to kidney failure and the shortest long-term survival. His literature review also found that social-cultural issues have an impact on compliance for men in this demographic group. Issues related to self-worth, masculinity and, distrust of the health care system in general, have all been identified in previous research as factors that interfere with compliance with medical treatment regimens. Dr. Banner believes that if he can build a sense of community and trust among these men, he can improve compliance for this population and reduce poor health outcomes. He believes he can improve outcomes for these patients by using patient education, socialization and support techniques similar to those used by self-help groups like Alcoholics Anonymous. He is proposing an intervention which will build supportive relationships and community among his patients and raise awareness about disease management to improve patient compliance. He theorizes that this intervention will lead to better health outcomes for these patients. Dr. Banner recognizes that to be successful he must ensure that the intervention is meeting the needs of these patients, therefore, he will identify and include the patients and their families in designing and implementing the intervention and evaluating the success of the intervention. He will gather input from patients and their families by using focus groups and an open-ended survey. After one year, Dr. Banner will conduct a study to determine if the intervention was successful.

Assignment

Based on the scenario described in Concept Review 1 (described again below) we can see that Dr. Banner is proposing a form of participatory action research (PAR). This is because the intervention he is proposing to address the problem involves the patients themselves in developing the solution. His research will include a patient satisfaction survey that is partially designed based on patient feedback resulting from a focus group. He will also measure patient compliance with dialysis for the program participants before and after the intervention. Based on this week’s lecture describe the ethical issues raised and how Dr. Banner can address them to protect the research participants in a brief work.

Requirements for Submission:

• Uploaded as a MS Word document by due date

• No face sheet is needed

• Minimum of 5 complete sentences

• Free of grammar, spelling, sentence structure and punctuation errors

• Correct application of key terms from the lecture.

Requirement Complete Answer

No Errors Mostly

Complete

Errors do not interfere with

Meaning Severe Errors or not addressed

• Double-spaced – no face page

• Each answer must be a minimum of 5 sentences

• Upload as MS Word document to Blackboard by due date

• Free of spelling and grammar and punctuation errors

1 .5 0

• Correct application of key terms from the lecture 4 .2 0

TOTAL 5